Eastern European vs Bolivian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Eastern European
Bolivian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Bolivians
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Bolivian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,083,832 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.711 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,239,714 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 0.40%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Eastern European | Bolivian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.7% |
Range | 99.0% | 47.7% |
Mean | 15.5% | 12.5% |
Median | 9.0% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 15.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.1% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.8% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans and Bolivians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.67%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.83%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |