Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Mexico Female Poverty
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Immigrants from Mexico
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Immigrants from Mexico
17.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Mexico Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,761,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,228,632 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.67%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Immigrants from Mexico |
Minimum | 9.6% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 43.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 33.7% | 93.3% |
Mean | 19.7% | 27.4% |
Median | 19.3% | 21.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 16.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.8% | 28.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 19.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians and Immigrants from Mexico by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Creek (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.34%), African (16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |