Dutch vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Dutch
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Dutch
Chickasaw
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 542,951,177 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.227 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,366,373 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 31.9%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dutch | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.7% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 40.4% | 68.8% |
Range | 38.7% | 63.7% |
Mean | 12.6% | 24.3% |
Median | 13.0% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 10.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Dutch by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Switzerland (14.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Egypt (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from England (14.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Basque (14.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Argentineans | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 96.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | France | 95.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 95.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 14.7% |
British | 95.5 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Basques | 94.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Liberian (19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.2% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.4% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.5% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |