Czech vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Czech
Zimbabwean
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Czechs
Zimbabweans
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Zimbabwean Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,396,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,980,540 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.67% |
Maximum | 36.6% | 32.2% |
Range | 35.5% | 31.5% |
Mean | 14.9% | 12.0% |
Median | 14.5% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Zimbabweans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |