Czech vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Immigrants from Hong Kong
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,390,324 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 7.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,546,628 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 2.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.35% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 13.9% |
Range | 23.4% | 13.5% |
Mean | 7.4% | 6.2% |
Median | 6.6% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Italian (7.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Japan (7.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (7.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Russian (7.5%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iran (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Danish (7.3%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.5% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.5% |