Czechoslovakian vs Taiwanese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Taiwanese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Taiwanese
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Taiwanese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,669,641 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 2.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Taiwanese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 17.2% |
Range | 21.9% | 15.7% |
Mean | 9.4% | 7.9% |
Median | 7.6% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Taiwanese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Romanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Basque (8.1%, a difference of 0.23%), French Canadian (8.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and Egyptian (8.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |