Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Samoan
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Samoans
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Samoan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,979,827 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,909,678 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 2.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Samoan |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 54.7% | 50.0% |
Range | 51.9% | 48.3% |
Mean | 24.4% | 16.3% |
Median | 20.3% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.7% | 19.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.7% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Samoans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Canadian (15.4%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Peru (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Hungary (15.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (15.6%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
Welsh | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.5% |
Peruvians | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Portuguese | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Icelanders | 87.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.6% |
Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 85.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Slavs | 84.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 84.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |