Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from North America
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from North America
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,467,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,028,692 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from North America |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 3.5% |
| Maximum | 32.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 31.8% | 96.5% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 26.2% |
| Median | 12.3% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 17.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 24.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Immigrants from North America by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |