Cuban vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Yugoslavian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Yugoslavians
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,594,477 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,600,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.45%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 35.9% | 66.7% |
| Range | 33.4% | 64.4% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 15.4% |
| Median | 11.4% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Yugoslavians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ukrainian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Austria (12.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
| Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |