Croatian vs Lithuanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Lithuanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Lithuanians
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Lithuanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,484,978 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,598,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 35.7% | 27.5% |
| Range | 34.8% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 11.1% |
| Median | 10.0% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Lithuanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.80%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |