Croatian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Immigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Immigrants from Lithuania
10.6%
POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,543,328 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,712,051 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 2.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Immigrants from Lithuania |
Minimum | 0.99% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 18.3% |
Range | 31.2% | 16.4% |
Mean | 10.0% | 7.7% |
Median | 9.1% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Immigrants from Lithuania by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Italian (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Eastern European (10.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Luxembourger (10.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.89%), Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |