Costa Rican vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
White/Caucasian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Whites/Caucasians
9.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
49.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
69.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs White/Caucasian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,260,366 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 578,762,373 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.883 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 2.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 0.94% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 33.1% | 30.1% |
Range | 32.2% | 23.8% |
Mean | 9.5% | 12.0% |
Median | 8.0% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Whites/Caucasians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Albania (9.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Fiji (8.9%, a difference of 0.94%), Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Oceania (8.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |
Costa Ricans | 49.3 /100 | #175 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 47.5 /100 | #176 | Average 9.0% |