Chilean vs Armenian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Armenian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Armenians
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
84.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Armenian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,534,344 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,749,032 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Armenian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 25.4% | 26.9% |
Range | 22.9% | 24.0% |
Mean | 11.0% | 12.6% |
Median | 11.6% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 16.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Armenians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), French (12.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |