Chickasaw vs Liberian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Liberian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Liberians
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Liberian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,038,056 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 3.0%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Liberian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 45.5% |
| Range | 36.7% | 43.6% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 15.7% |
| Median | 17.3% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Liberians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.63%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Ottawa (15.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Jamaican (15.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |