Chickasaw vs Belizean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Belizean
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Belizeans
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Belizean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,559,889 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.719 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 2.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Belizean |
Minimum | 3.8% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.2% | 95.4% |
Mean | 26.8% | 23.9% |
Median | 21.7% | 19.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 24.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Belizeans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Comanche (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |