Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from El Salvador
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from El Salvador
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,220,722 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,675,141 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 0.49%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Minimum | 2.3% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 61.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.5% | 96.7% |
Mean | 21.9% | 17.2% |
Median | 19.3% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 18.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from El Salvador by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |