Cherokee vs Ecuadorian Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Ecuadorian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Ecuadorians
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Ecuadorian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,337,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,659,954 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 2.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.41% |
Maximum | 54.1% | 28.2% |
Range | 52.4% | 27.8% |
Mean | 19.3% | 13.5% |
Median | 17.3% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Ecuadorians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cape Verdean (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Sudanese (14.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Salvadoran (14.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Sudan (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and Potawatomi (14.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |