Central American vs Immigrants from India Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
Immigrants from India
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Immigrants from India
6.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Immigrants from India Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,895,847 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 429,262,972 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267 and weighted average of 3.6%, a difference of 85.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Immigrants from India |
Minimum | 2.1% | 0.29% |
Maximum | 41.9% | 10.9% |
Range | 39.8% | 10.6% |
Mean | 9.7% | 2.9% |
Median | 7.9% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Ecuador (6.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from El Salvador (6.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Belize (6.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.75%), and Cuban (6.8%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Chinese (3.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 2.1%), Slovene (3.8%, a difference of 5.7%), Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |