Celtic vs Moroccan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Celtic
Moroccan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Celtics
Moroccans
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
25.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Moroccan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,177,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,064,228 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 4.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Moroccan |
Minimum | 3.3% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 70.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.6% | 93.0% |
Mean | 25.7% | 26.4% |
Median | 20.4% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 35.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 22.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.5% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Moroccans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Kenya (17.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |