Carpatho Rusyn vs Palestinian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Palestinian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Palestinians
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
91.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Palestinian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,506,297 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,667,455 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 0.050%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Palestinian |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 80.8% | 43.3% |
Range | 77.8% | 41.7% |
Mean | 18.2% | 16.4% |
Median | 14.5% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 19.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.1% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Palestinians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Canadian (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.4%, a difference of 0.35%), Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Norway (15.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Canadians | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
Welsh | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.5% |
Peruvians | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Portuguese | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Icelanders | 87.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |