Carpatho Rusyn vs Croatian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Croatian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Croatians
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Croatian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,607,667 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,918,028 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 0.050%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Croatian |
Minimum | 0.39% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 8.8% | 28.1% |
Range | 8.4% | 26.3% |
Mean | 3.7% | 6.6% |
Median | 3.3% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 8.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Croatians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |