Cape Verdean vs Bangladeshi Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Bangladeshi
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Bangladeshis
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Bangladeshi Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,527,352 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,334,691 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 4.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 3.0% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 31.5% | 28.8% |
Range | 28.5% | 24.9% |
Mean | 12.7% | 13.8% |
Median | 11.6% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.2% | 17.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Bangladeshis by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.97%), Chickasaw (13.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |