Burmese vs Bolivian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Burmese
Bolivian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Burmese
Bolivians
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Bolivian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,445,495 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 17.9%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Bolivian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 43.2% | 62.7% |
| Range | 41.3% | 61.1% |
| Mean | 16.0% | 19.6% |
| Median | 15.4% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Bolivians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |