Bulgarian vs Tsimshian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Tsimshian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bulgarians
Tsimshian
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Tsimshian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,945,490 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,575,613 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.398 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 14.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 0.87% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 52.6% |
Range | 45.8% | 49.7% |
Mean | 12.7% | 15.9% |
Median | 11.4% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Tsimshian by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Thai (11.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Immigrants from India (11.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |