Black/African American vs Yuman Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Black/African American
Yuman
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Yuman
26.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Yuman Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,844,425 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 26.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,574,686 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 29.4%, a difference of 11.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Black/African American | Yuman |
Minimum | 17.1% | 12.7% |
Maximum | 49.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 32.1% | 87.3% |
Mean | 28.1% | 43.1% |
Median | 27.8% | 39.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.8% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 52.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 30.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 24.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans and Yuman by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.95%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Colville (29.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Ute (28.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |