Bhutanese vs Bolivian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Bolivian
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Bhutanese
Bolivians
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Bolivian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,439,878 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Bolivian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 32.4% | 25.9% |
| Range | 31.4% | 24.3% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 7.8% |
| Median | 8.8% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Bolivians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (9.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Sweden (9.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 1.1%), Czech (9.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |