Bhutanese vs Australian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Australian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Australians
11.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Australian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,052,143 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 10.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Australian |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 78.1% |
| Range | 64.2% | 77.2% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 14.9% |
| Median | 9.4% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 13.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |