Belgian vs Sri Lankan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Belgian
Sri Lankan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Belgians
Sri Lankans
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belgian vs Sri Lankan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,783,790 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.568 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,135,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 0.060%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Belgian | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 0.93% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 29.6% | 43.9% |
Range | 28.6% | 42.6% |
Mean | 11.2% | 16.8% |
Median | 11.4% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Belgians and Sri Lankans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Denmark (15.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Croatia (15.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Denmark (15.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |