Belgian vs Palestinian Poverty
COMPARE
Belgian
Palestinian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Belgians
Palestinians
11.4%
POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belgian vs Palestinian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,864,059 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Belgian | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 23.4% | 25.3% |
| Range | 21.2% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 10.8% |
| Median | 9.0% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Belgians and Palestinians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Czechoslovakian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and British (11.4%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |