Austrian vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Austrian
Tsimshian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Austrians
Tsimshian
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Austrian vs Tsimshian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,465,391 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,607,762 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 35.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Austrian | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 16.0% |
Range | 36.2% | 14.2% |
Mean | 10.8% | 5.9% |
Median | 7.2% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Austrians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Austrians are French (4.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Cree (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (5.9%, a difference of 0.46%), Iraqi (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |