Australian vs Welsh Female Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Welsh
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Australians
Welsh
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Welsh Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,858,131 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Welsh |
Minimum | 0.92% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 78.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 77.2% | 97.0% |
Mean | 14.9% | 19.2% |
Median | 11.6% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 19.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Welsh by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Puget Sound Salish (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |