Armenian vs South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Armenian
South African
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Armenians
South Africans
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs South African Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,744,941 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,602,695 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.734 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 0.23%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | South African |
Minimum | 2.6% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 32.7% | 60.5% |
Range | 30.1% | 55.9% |
Mean | 13.8% | 17.6% |
Median | 11.7% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and South Africans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.10%), New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |