Arapaho vs Turkish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Arapaho
Turkish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Arapaho
Turks
26.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Turkish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,687,271 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.396 and weighted average of 26.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 41.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arapaho | Turkish |
| Minimum | 14.1% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 63.9% | 67.9% |
| Range | 49.8% | 66.2% |
| Mean | 35.9% | 20.0% |
| Median | 32.1% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.0% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.4% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 14.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 14.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Arapaho by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Chickasaw (26.3%, a difference of 0.63%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.64%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |