Apache vs Palestinian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Apache
Palestinian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Apache
Palestinians
23.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Palestinian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,480,863 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 23.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,678,574 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 58.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Apache | Palestinian |
Minimum | 7.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 40.9% |
Range | 93.0% | 39.1% |
Mean | 44.3% | 16.5% |
Median | 40.4% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 55.2% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.1% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Apache by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Native/Alaskan (23.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Dominican (23.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Pueblo (23.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (24.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and Black/African American (24.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 23.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 23.9% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 24.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |
Canadians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.2% |