Alsatian vs Ethiopian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Alsatian
Ethiopian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Alsatians
Ethiopians
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
51.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
68.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Ethiopian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,494,260 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,211,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alsatian | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 8.9% | 22.9% |
Range | 6.8% | 21.8% |
Mean | 4.9% | 6.0% |
Median | 5.0% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Ethiopians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Bermudan (5.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Marshallese (5.2%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |