Aleut vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Aleut
Bhutanese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Aleuts
Bhutanese
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,373,672 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,468,872 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 40.2%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Aleut | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 4.2% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 38.6% |
Range | 95.8% | 37.9% |
Mean | 31.1% | 11.3% |
Median | 20.0% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.3% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.7% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.2% | 7.0% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants (17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Armenia (17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Panamanian (17.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Alaskan Athabascan (17.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Portugal | 11.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
German Russians | 10.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 8.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 17.5% |
Malaysians | 7.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.86%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |