Alaskan Athabascan vs Inupiat Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Inupiat
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Inupiat
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Inupiat Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,439,676 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,492,262 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 22.0%, a difference of 0.91%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Inupiat |
Minimum | 2.7% | 5.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 81.2% |
Range | 97.3% | 75.5% |
Mean | 45.5% | 32.0% |
Median | 42.3% | 23.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.3% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 61.3% | 46.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 42.0% | 28.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.0% | 18.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.7% | 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Inupiat by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Blackfeet (21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Chickasaw (21.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Hispanic or Latino (21.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Yaqui (21.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and Cherokee (21.7%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Iroquois (22.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Guatemala (22.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (22.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Chickasaw (21.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and Blackfeet (21.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 21.6% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 21.6% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 21.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 21.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 21.7% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 21.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 22.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 22.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 22.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 22.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 22.7% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 22.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 22.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 22.8% |