White/Caucasian vs Japanese In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Japanese
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Japanese
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Japanese In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,949,283 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.766 and weighted average of 81.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,074,736 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 81.6%, a difference of 0.29%.
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Japanese |
Minimum | 69.8% | 36.4% |
Maximum | 84.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 14.2% | 63.6% |
Mean | 80.2% | 77.0% |
Median | 80.8% | 81.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 78.7% | 74.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.2% | 83.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Japanese by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Samoan (81.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cambodia (81.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Thailand (81.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from El Salvador (81.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Celtic (81.8%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Laos (81.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Scotch-Irish (81.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Pennsylvania German (81.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Guamanian/Chamorro (81.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Barbadian (81.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 1.2 /100 | #237 | Tragic 82.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 1.1 /100 | #238 | Tragic 81.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 1.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 81.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.0 /100 | #240 | Tragic 81.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 81.9% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 81.9% |
Samoans | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 81.8% |
Celtics | 0.4 /100 | #244 | Tragic 81.8% |
Alaska Natives | 0.4 /100 | #245 | Tragic 81.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 81.8% |
Central Americans | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 81.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 81.7% |
Hmong | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 81.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 81.7% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 81.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 81.6% |
Japanese | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 81.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 81.6% |
Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 81.6% |