Slavic vs French American Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Slavic
French American Indian
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Slavs
French American Indians
40.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
39.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs French American Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,628,141 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 40.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,885,422 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 39.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | French American Indian |
Minimum | 14.6% | 8.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 68.0% |
Range | 85.4% | 59.8% |
Mean | 54.1% | 41.5% |
Median | 45.6% | 42.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.6% | 33.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.5% | 48.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.9% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.6% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.3% | 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and French American Indians by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (40.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Aleut (40.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (40.4%, a difference of 0.15%), American (40.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Cherokee (40.2%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Hungarian (39.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (39.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Malaysian (39.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Serbian (39.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Iroquois (39.9%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Aleuts | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Slavs | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Americans | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 40.3% |
Cherokee | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 40.2% |
Northern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 40.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 100.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 40.2% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 40.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 100.0 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 40.1% |
Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 40.1% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 40.1% |
Potawatomi | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 40.0% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 40.0% |
Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 39.9% |
Iroquois | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 39.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 39.9% |
Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 39.8% |
French American Indians | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 39.8% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 39.7% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 99.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 39.7% |