Pima vs Turkish In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Pima
Turkish
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Pima
Turks
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Turkish In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,716,340 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 85.7%, a difference of 8.4%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Turkish |
Minimum | 46.4% | 59.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.6% | 41.0% |
Mean | 79.8% | 85.8% |
Median | 81.6% | 86.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.6% | 83.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.0% | 88.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Italy (85.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Zimbabwean (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Eastern European (85.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (85.6%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Ugandans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Albanians | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.6% |