Hmong vs Osage In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Hmong
Osage
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Hmong
Osage
82.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong vs Osage In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,669,739 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 82.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,339 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 82.9%, a difference of 0.46%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong | Osage |
Minimum | 54.9% | 33.3% |
Maximum | 97.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.5% | 66.7% |
Mean | 83.6% | 82.5% |
Median | 83.7% | 83.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 80.7% | 78.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.4% | 88.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 13.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Hmong and Osage by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Mexican American Indian (82.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (82.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Tlingit-Haida (82.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (82.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Potawatomi (82.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Guatemala (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Belize (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 83.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 83.1% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 83.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 82.9% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 82.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 82.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 82.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 82.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 82.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.8% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 82.7% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 82.6% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 82.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 82.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 82.5% |