Ecuadorian vs Romanian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Romanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Ecuadorians
Romanians
65.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
31.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Romanian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,862,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,921,864 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Romanians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Romanian |
Minimum | 51.2% | 22.5% |
Maximum | 77.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 26.7% | 77.5% |
Mean | 66.7% | 60.8% |
Median | 66.4% | 60.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.3% | 54.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.2% | 65.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 14.8% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Norwegian (65.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
New Zealanders | 96.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 95.9 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 95.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Iraqis | 95.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Norwegians | 95.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Koreans | 95.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Ecuadorians | 94.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (65.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Haitian (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Europe (65.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | Portugal | 34.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 65.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 34.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 65.0% |
Barbadians | 33.9 /100 | #190 | Fair 65.0% |
Scandinavians | 33.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 65.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 33.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 65.0% |
Immigrants | Europe | 33.6 /100 | #193 | Fair 65.0% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 31.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 65.0% |
Romanians | 31.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 65.0% |
Haitians | 30.6 /100 | #196 | Fair 65.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 28.7 /100 | #197 | Fair 65.0% |
Greeks | 26.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 64.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.1 /100 | #199 | Fair 64.9% |
Armenians | 20.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 64.9% |
Ukrainians | 19.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |