Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,579,210 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 38.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,262,337 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 38.9%, a difference of 1.4%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from North Macedonia
Minimum	7.1%	25.9%
Maximum	71.4%	77.6%
Range	64.3%	51.7%
Mean	36.5%	45.0%
Median	37.5%	42.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	29.4%	39.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	42.8%	46.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.5%	7.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	13.1%	12.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.0%	12.3%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from North Macedonia by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Nepal (38.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Colville (38.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Hawaiian (38.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Subsaharan African (38.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Ugandan (38.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (38.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Hmong (38.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Zimbabwean (38.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (38.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Ugandans	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 38.7%
Hmong	99.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 38.7%
Zimbabweans	99.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	99.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 38.7%
Iraqis	98.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 38.6%
Delaware	98.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 38.6%
Chinese	98.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 38.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	98.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 38.6%
Lebanese	98.7 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 38.6%
Maltese	98.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 38.5%
Crow	98.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 38.5%
Immigrants \| Scotland	98.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 38.5%
Sub-Saharan Africans	98.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 38.4%
Hawaiians	98.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 38.4%
Bulgarians	97.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 38.3%
Colville	97.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 38.3%
Chickasaw	97.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 38.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	97.8 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 38.3%