Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Congo In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,860,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148 and weighted average of 40.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,123,036 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077 and weighted average of 41.7%, a difference of 2.2%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Carpatho Rusyn	Immigrants from Congo
Minimum	21.5%	16.1%
Maximum	62.8%	65.5%
Range	41.3%	49.4%
Mean	42.7%	41.1%
Median	42.6%	42.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	35.4%	37.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	50.5%	45.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	15.1%	8.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.9%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.8%	9.1%

Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Immigrants from Congo by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Icelander (40.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Cree (40.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Indonesian (40.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Zaire (40.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Laos (40.6%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from the Azores (41.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Yugoslavian (41.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (41.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Liberian (41.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Czechoslovakians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 41.9%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 41.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 41.8%
Yugoslavians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 41.8%
Immigrants \| Azores	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 41.7%
Immigrants \| Congo	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 41.7%
Sioux	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 41.5%
Scotch-Irish	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 41.5%
Immigrants \| Liberia	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 41.5%
Celtics	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 41.3%
Whites/Caucasians	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 41.3%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 41.2%
Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 41.1%
Croatians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 41.1%
Immigrants \| Sudan	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 41.0%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 40.8%
Icelanders	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 40.8%
Cree	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 40.8%
Indonesians	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 40.7%
Immigrants \| Zaire	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 40.7%
Immigrants \| Laos	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 40.6%