Bhutanese vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Slavic
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Bhutanese
Slavs
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
87.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,199,053 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,763,521 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Slavic |
| Minimum | 56.7% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.3% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 85.0% | 85.2% |
| Median | 85.7% | 87.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.0% | 82.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 89.0% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 16.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Slavs by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Sri Lankan (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Asia (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Austrian (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Jordan (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Bhutanese | 87.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 84.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Colombians | 82.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 84.9% |