Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Householder Income Over 65 years
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Chickasaw
Householder Income Over 65 years
Householder Income Over 65 years Comparison
Yugoslavians
Chickasaw
$58,243
HOUSEHOLDER INCOME OVER 65 YEARS
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
220th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$53,732
HOUSEHOLDER INCOME OVER 65 YEARS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,278,899 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of $58,243. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,447,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of $53,732, a difference of 8.4%.
Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | $19,307 | $22,146 |
Maximum | $103,095 | $78,125 |
Range | $83,788 | $55,979 |
Mean | $56,075 | $46,305 |
Median | $55,920 | $45,875 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $45,775 | $38,542 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $59,846 | $53,486 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $14,071 | $14,944 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $16,651 | $12,086 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $16,469 | $12,005 |
Similar Demographics by Householder Income Over 65 years
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Householder Income Over 65 years
In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Malaysian ($58,244, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from El Salvador ($58,226, a difference of 0.030%), Panamanian ($58,266, a difference of 0.040%), Delaware ($58,214, a difference of 0.050%), and Sudanese ($58,281, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Householder Income Over 65 years |
Whites/Caucasians | 9.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic $58,847 |
Nepalese | 9.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic $58,761 |
Immigrants | Ghana | 7.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic $58,624 |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 6.2 /100 | #216 | Tragic $58,375 |
Sudanese | 5.7 /100 | #217 | Tragic $58,281 |
Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic $58,266 |
Malaysians | 5.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic $58,244 |
Yugoslavians | 5.5 /100 | #220 | Tragic $58,243 |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 5.4 /100 | #221 | Tragic $58,226 |
Delaware | 5.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic $58,214 |
Tsimshian | 5.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic $58,202 |
Bermudans | 5.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic $58,171 |
Venezuelans | 4.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic $58,026 |
French Canadians | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic $57,975 |
Japanese | 3.9 /100 | #227 | Tragic $57,919 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Householder Income Over 65 years
In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois ($53,737, a difference of 0.010%), African ($53,711, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados ($53,766, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute ($53,762, a difference of 0.060%), and Shoshone ($53,681, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Householder Income Over 65 years |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic $53,967 |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic $53,950 |
Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic $53,897 |
Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic $53,847 |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic $53,766 |
Paiute | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic $53,762 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic $53,737 |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #290 | Tragic $53,732 |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic $53,711 |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic $53,681 |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic $53,665 |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic $53,591 |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic $53,420 |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic $53,333 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic $53,265 |