Aleut vs Chippewa Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Aleut
Chippewa
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Aleuts
Chippewa
$42,210
PER CAPITA INCOME
16.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,631
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Chippewa Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,782,949 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.570 and weighted average of $42,210. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,067,961 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.751 and weighted average of $36,631, a difference of 15.2%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Chippewa |
| Minimum | $9,575 | $8,325 |
| Maximum | $81,877 | $44,407 |
| Range | $72,302 | $36,082 |
| Mean | $34,258 | $25,989 |
| Median | $34,500 | $27,024 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $22,490 | $19,564 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $43,602 | $32,911 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $21,112 | $13,347 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $13,784 | $8,516 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $13,667 | $8,476 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are White/Caucasian ($42,180, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish ($42,249, a difference of 0.090%), Ghanaian ($42,164, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina ($42,278, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Thailand ($42,289, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Scotch-Irish | 22.6 /100 | #197 | Fair $42,563 |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 19.7 /100 | #198 | Poor $42,412 |
| Barbadians | 19.6 /100 | #199 | Poor $42,406 |
| Vietnamese | 19.0 /100 | #200 | Poor $42,368 |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 17.6 /100 | #201 | Poor $42,289 |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor $42,278 |
| Spanish | 17.0 /100 | #203 | Poor $42,249 |
| Aleuts | 16.4 /100 | #204 | Poor $42,210 |
| Whites/Caucasians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor $42,180 |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #206 | Poor $42,164 |
| Venezuelans | 14.4 /100 | #207 | Poor $42,074 |
| Panamanians | 13.9 /100 | #208 | Poor $42,035 |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 13.2 /100 | #209 | Poor $41,986 |
| Ecuadorians | 12.9 /100 | #210 | Poor $41,958 |
| Immigrants | Panama | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor $41,853 |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.090%), Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw ($36,475, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Latin America ($36,823, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Hondurans | 0.1 /100 | #304 | Tragic $37,031 |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |