Ugandan vs Alsatian Family Households
COMPARE
Ugandan
Alsatian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ugandans
Alsatians
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Alsatian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,680,020 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.511 and weighted average of 61.7%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Alsatian |
Minimum | 43.1% | 40.3% |
Maximum | 82.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.5% | 59.7% |
Mean | 63.6% | 69.7% |
Median | 63.1% | 67.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.7% | 60.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.8% | 78.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 18.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Alsatians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |