Turkish vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Oceania
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,710,288 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422 and weighted average of 63.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 2.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 35.7% | 8.8% |
| Maximum | 81.5% | 91.4% |
| Range | 45.8% | 82.6% |
| Mean | 65.5% | 64.5% |
| Median | 64.5% | 67.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.3% | 62.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 15.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Turks by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (63.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and French Canadian (63.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |