Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Chickasaw
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Chickasaw
32.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
32.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Chickasaw Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,376,059 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 32.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%, a difference of 12.7%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 6.9% | 5.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 93.1% | 94.4% |
Mean | 49.2% | 53.6% |
Median | 52.2% | 47.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.6% | 34.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.0% | 70.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 32.4% | 36.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.4% | 25.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.9% | 25.3% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Irish (32.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Colombian (32.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Fijian (32.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kenya (32.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and Osage (32.1%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Canadians | 41.4 /100 | #183 | Average 31.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 40.7 /100 | #184 | Average 32.0% |
Germans | 39.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 32.0% |
Welsh | 38.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 32.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 35.5% |
Bermudans | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic 35.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 35.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 36.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 36.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |
Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |